Manila International Airport

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
451 messages Options
1 ... 1920212223
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator

DOTr finds technical proposals of four NAIA bidders complete

By Darwin G. Amojelar
The Department of Transportation (DOTr) said Monday all four qualified bidders for the rehabilitation of the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) submitted complete technical proposals, paving the way for the evaluation stage of the multi-billion peso project.


The DOTr technical working group recommended during the opening of technical proposals of the qualified bidders that the bids and awards committee (BAC) proceed with the evaluation of documents.

It said the Manila International Airport Consortium, Asian Airport Consortium, GMR Airport Consortium and SMC SAP & Co. Consortium passed the requirements based on their submitted technical proposal documents.

DOTr undersecretary for planning and pre-qualifications and bids and awards committee chair Timothy John Batan said the technical evaluation would be conducted until Feb. 4 .

Batan said the opening of financial proposals is scheduled on Feb. 8, while the results of the evaluation would be announced on Feb. 14.

The government will issue the notice of award on Feb. 15.  The winning bidder will have until March 6 to submit the post-award requirements.

The DOTr expects to sign the concession agreement with the winning bidder on March 15, with the turnover of the facility likely in September this year.

https://manilastandard.net/business/314407560/dotr-finds-technical-proposals-of-four-naia-bidders-complete.html
Making Sense
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

romantic_guy08

BIZ BUZZ: Now showing: New ‘airportserye’

A new “airportserye” season is unfolding and it looks like another exciting production.

We’re referring to the P170-billion operations and maintenance deal for the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (Naia), which has four private sector groups vying for control of the country’s busiest gateway.

The airport auction is entering the final stage of evaluation and this is where things get spicy because there’s now talk of groups seeking the disqualification of SMC Sap. & Co. Consortium.

Biz Buzz learned that some bidders plan to ask the bids and awards committee to look closer into SMC SAP’s use of alleged shell entities that control the consortium. We’re told these had been established to minimize the participation of billionaire Ramon Ang’s San Miguel Corp. (SMC), at least on paper.

This is important because the Naia project bidding terms detail certain restrictions on companies that own nearby airport projects to remove any conflict of interest. The nearby airport projects listed were Clark International Airport (Pampanga), Sangley Point International Airport and New Manila International Airport in Bulacan, which is being developed by SMC.

Under the rules, such companies can own a maximum of 33 percent (we’re told this was raised from the initial 20-percent cap) in a consortium bidding for Naia.

The disqualification scare is coming to light amid rumors that SMC SAP Consortium has submitted a rather aggressive bid for the Naia project.

SMC also has a track record for bidding to win when we consider past privatization projects under the Aquino administration.

Whether this is a case of fearful rivals or something more is up to the bids and awards committee to sort out. As we say here, abangan!— Miguel R. Camus
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

JNC03
Let's see if SMC can do their magic this time
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator
In reply to this post by romantic_guy08
Its just a buzz. Nobody except SMC knows how much their bid for NAIA is. Intriga lang. We will know that only on February 8. What has been opened were technical documents. You won't see the bid there.
Making Sense
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

JNC03

From four, only three consortia are now bidding for the privatization of the Ninoy Aquino International Airport, the Department of Transportation announces on Thursday.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator
San Miguel Corporation it is

San Miguel Holdings Corp. won a $3 billion government bid to spruce up Manila’s main aviation gateway, the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA), it was announced on Thursday.

According to the terms of reference, the percentage revenue share to the government is the primary bid parameter for the auction, indicating that a higher proposed revenue share is preferable.

https://gulfnews.com/business/aviation/filipino-billionaire-leads-win-in-3bn-bid-to-upgrade-manila-airport-1.1707409774221
SMC offered 82.16 percent government share in airport revenues. Meaning, 11% lang sa net profit  kunin nila.

The difference is very wide. Paano mo hahabulin yan.

33.3 percent - GMR Airports Consortium
25.91 percent - Manila International Airport Consortium, comprising Aboitiz InfraCapital, Ayala’s AC Infrastructure Holdings Corp., Alliance Global-Infracorp, Filinvest, and JG Summit Holdings


SMC SAP is formed by the San Miguel Holdings Corp., RMM Asian Logistics, Inc., RLW Aviation Development, Inc. and Incheon International Airport Corp. So it will be Incheon Airport that operates NAIA.
Making Sense
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

idp5601
Does anyone know who the hell RLW Aviation Developments and RMM Asian Logistics are? Trying to look them up online and pretty much all the results are just about the NAIA bid. Are they actual companies or dummy firms made to get around ownership restrictions?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator
Only SMC is domestic



Synergy. Really makes a lot of sense
Making Sense
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Solblanc

SMC can easily make those revenues happen… if they decide not to spend at all on capex.

Seriously, after what they did to caticlan, even with incheon onboard, what can they do? It’ll be like handing over the henhouse to the fox. SMC will greatly benefit if NAIA fails.

And aren’t they already stretching themselves a little thin? Shouldn’t they focus on finishing their existing projects and having those generate revenues?

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator
To have that fact in perspective, SMC never had Caticlan Airport project in the beginning. Management contract was owned by Yang family, particularly George T. Yang, owner of McDonalds in the Philippines, and his associates Rafael P. Puno, Lino A. Barte, and RPRP Ventures Management and Development Corp.

I was telling the other forum about these things before but I guess nobody bothered to read it so I am telling it again.

The management plan was to improve the existing terminal building, extend and widen the runway, build a new passenger terminal building, vehicular parking area and other facilities with a price tag of ₱2.5 billion for the whole project. Not for the PTBs alone as was later on claimed by SMC. Projected expenses turns out to be more. A billion more.

The award which costs Yang ₱2.5 billion as development expenses entail two stages, as proposed on their bid documents: the construction of a new ₱2.1-billion passenger terminal in the first stage, and the extension of the existing runway from 950 meters (3,120 ft) to 2,100 meters (6,900 ft) as well as upgrading airport equipment and the existing apron, which would cost ₱360 million. It turns out Yang was too ambitious with his projections as depression hits the economy in 2009 affecting his business. He had no choice but sell its stake.

Yang was expected to add another floor to the one-storey terminal building and flatten out an adjacent hill, which will involve moving 350,000 cubic meters of soil. Never happened. It was SMC that does the job. The CIADC was also expected to build fences around the airport, upgrade the fire station and fit the facility with new navigational aids. Did not also happen as SMC bought these equipment.

The next phase, now done by SMC, extended and widen the runway to what it is today, cost another billion from the proposed ₱360 million. Of which billion was supposed to finance a new two-storey terminal building which was built according to SMC projections of international operations. It turns out the expenses  for airside operations was closing the 2b mark even without the new PTB in place.

The final phase, which is about this year, includes further extension and widening of the runway towards the sea, which will never happen as DENR denied permit for its construction due to environmental concerns.

If you take a look at the 25 years concession agreement, their was never a word mentioning it as an "international airport". Only the company operating it was. Because the "gateway" airport is in "Kalibo". Not in Caticlan. Which means it remains to be a domestic airport. Services to "international destinations" was mere propaganda, as DOTr and CAAP never meant it to be one.

Knowing these mistakes to their bid and their difficult financial position, CIADC sold their interest to SMC's Trans Aire without telling them the restrictions much to their delight. And then SMC pursued the same strategy to make it "international" which they realized later on was never part of the concession. Their attempt to modify the contract during Pnoy time failed. And so their PTB construction hit the wall, as it will cost them a billion more, with the hopes on them bagging the amendments. Still, It never happened during Tugade's time. What you see now is the temporary PTB warehouse.

Also what they have now is a provisional permit granted by JJB in 2022, allowing them to fly special international flights which is time-limited. Not regular flights. This is the reason you find pre-cleared flights from China and Taiwan. But it doesn't mean the concession was amended. Its the same CA approved in 2009. It still is a domestic airport, as clearly known nowadays as "Boracay Airport."

So you just have the protruding modular steel beams now which is supposed to accommodate 5mppa and is supposed to be completed on the 15th year, which is today, but is nowhere close to it. Even without covid they won't still reach this number now. Probably in the next 5 years which is its 20th year out of the 25.

So you see, this really was a loss investment for SMC. They were supposed to rake in profit at this time but Trans Aire is still operating at a loss. Thus, deferment of compulsory expense, which is completion of PTB.  That is why they make sure to win NAIA contract so that they can divert excess traffic by the time new MNL opens in 2028, which would otherwise be impossible to happen if other operators had won and decided to keep excess traffic at NAIA.


Making Sense
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator
In reply to this post by idp5601
idp5601 wrote
Does anyone know who the hell RLW Aviation Developments and RMM Asian Logistics are? Trying to look them up online and pretty much all the results are just about the NAIA bid. Are they actual companies or dummy firms made to get around ownership restrictions?

Raymond Miller Moreno (RMM)
Robert Lee Wong (RLW)

This might help you
https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/inside-track/something-fishy-san-miguel-consortium-naia-bidding-rehabilitation/

Nominee corporations are not necessarily dummy. Multinational Financiers hide in Nominee through Trust agreements. That's why I call it foreign because financiers usually are funding the project, so the beneficial owners of it and not the Filipino whose name it was registered.

The bottom line that will be considered by BAC is the credit line banks would give to these corporations. Mind you, nominees have a billion credit line more than their capitalization. And nominee corporation work that way. Basically to conceal their identity from their competitors. A dummy corporation doesn't have that same financial muscle for its credit line as they are dependent of the holding company. If SMC holds them, they would have the same bank credit line. Nominee meanwhile has a different bank.

So lets wait for DOTr to verify their credit line. Its either they have or doesn't have that money.
Making Sense
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

JNC03
In reply to this post by JNC03
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

JNC03
San Miguel Corporation led group SMC-SAP Company and Consortium is the winner of the months-long bidding race for the operations and maintenance of the Ninoy Aquino International Airport, as announced by the Department of Transportation and Manila International Airport Authority in a media briefing on Feb. 16.

The group proposed the highest bid amount among the three bidders for the airport, offering to give the national government 82.16 percent of airport revenues.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator
The Award confirms that neither company alleged to be associated with SMC are dummy, and affirms its nature as that of a nominee which would finance this project.
Making Sense
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator
Timothy Batan just confirmed the two alleged dummy company will contribute equity, meaning, lenders, as they will put $2b investments, so nominal corporations.
Making Sense
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Evodesire
In reply to this post by JNC03
Somehow disappointed that SMC won it. Well, basing it on what they did to PAL, the MPH airport where pax still need to be bussed across the runway after 4 years, the quality of SLEX, STAR, and Skyway roads.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator
As I was talking about two nominee corporations that other bidders thought was a dummy, well guess what, a genie has just been popped out. They will start buying the shares of these two companies.

More investors interested in NAIA funding, says Ang
MANILA, Philippines — More potential investors, including those who unsuccessfully bid, have expressed interest in participating in the 15-year contract to operate and upgrade the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA), the project’s winning proponent said.

Tycoon Ramon Ang, president and CEO of San Miguel Corp. (SMC) which leads the consortium that bagged the NAIA privatization contract, said they are keeping the funding runway open for other investors.

“We are open to partnerships to share the blessing,” he said.
https://www.philstar.com/business/2024/02/21/2334833/more-investors-interested-naia-funding-says-ang
Making Sense
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator
If you thought SMC offer was too generous, wait what a disqualified bidder offered. 76%.

“Of course not!” RSA asserted, smiling. Firstly, he pointed out that another bidder, the group of retailing king Lucio Co and Jeffrey Cheng, offered 76 percent of its revenues, or P848.8 billion – very close to San Miguel’s bid. “Those guys know their numbers,” says Ramon.

Co and Cheng were, however, disqualified for failing to hurdle the technical evaluation phase. Their group was composed of Cosco Capital, Asian Infrastructure and Management, Philippine Skylanders International and PT Angkasa Pura.
As to what SMC would do,
In 30 months, if not less, he guarantees to deliver a totally modern, almost new NAIA – with a new terminal building, a new runway, a new taxiway, eight floors of parking space and yes, new toilets. The new taxiway will be built in 24 months; the new terminal will be completed in 30 months.

NAIA will have three runways. Runway 13/31 will be moved backward by 300 meters to provide elbow room for Runway 06/24 so the two runways will no longer intersect or form a letter T and can thus operate independently of each other. Separating the two runways, plus an additional taxiway (for 06/24), has the potential of doubling NAIA’s aircraft movements in three years.

At the same time, part of the present Terminal I will be eaten up by expanded runways and a new taxiway. The existing Lufthansa Maintenance Apron will be converted into a Taxiway Lima. The three major terminals – I, II and III – will be connected by walkalators, not buses. The Department of Transportation had wanted buses.
https://www.philstar.com/opinion/2024/03/07/2338600/chat-rsa
All the highlighted ones is going to happen. Runway displacement is already completed. The rest is business propaganda.
Making Sense
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

JNC03
Other companies also planned constructing new runway in NAIA but it didnt happen, SMC cannot do it. For the space of LTP, they will resist🤣 it will not happen too
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NAIA O&M Contract

Arianespace
Administrator
LTP is outside MIAA. It is under PEZA. RSA cannot also modify T1 structure. It is a national heritage site under NHCP.

Third runway is still possible, but doubts its construction with Bulacan in the corner.
Making Sense
1 ... 1920212223