|
COO Mike already said they are studying if flights there are feasible
|
|
PR to start flying to DAD on July 1 with 3X weekly service.
|
|
is this a knee jerk reaction to 5J's DAD flights too?
|
|
Administrator
|
No. Its been in the drawing board earlier than 5J. The latter just have more planes to fly while the former grapples for 2 other neo on AOG. That is about to change in the coming months. These neo are long-range regional fleet, so we could see CTS and additional frequency to oz.
We did discuss this issue 2 years ago.
Making Sense
|
|
Administrator
|
Also,
I could already sense the first A35k is going to SFO
Making Sense
|
|
In reply to this post by Arianespace
As far as you are aware, does PR (or 5J) have any plans to serve Okinawa, Penang, or Phuket? Considering how popular Bali is here I'm surprised we don't have nonstops to Phuket (5J gave up on it over 10 years ago). Okinawa and Penang could also work as new destinations ala Da Nang/Chiang Mai/Sapporo; there was that one analysis showing that both had a sizable market out of MNL despite being unserved.
|
|
Administrator
|
This post was updated on .
What fuels traffic is the Filipino tourists. Not the Thai's for that matter. Meaning, most Filipinos prefer to have holidays in Thailand for its unique cultural heritage, and not for beaches to which we have plenty. Phi phi islands are for people who never saw Palawan. Which I think most Filipino tourists already saw. That also explains Da Nang, and Siem Reap.
For the routes you mentioned, Zamboanga and Sandakan has more traffic than what Penang, used to be served by Air Asia, and Okinawa used to be flown by PAL. Just look how many flights a small island like TWI have.
Making Sense
|
|
In reply to this post by Arianespace
Looks like another B77W will be AOG... 7782 diverted to HND due to smoke in the cabin...
PAL flight bound for Los Angeles diverted to Japan after detecting aircon smoke ![]()
|
|
In reply to this post by Arianespace
![]() Philippine Airlines officially re-launched its PAL Aviation School through a newly signed partnership agreement with Australia-based Airways Aviation. With this relaunch, the PAL Aviation School will begin accepting applications for cadet pilot screening. Successful candidates will undergo an 18-month intensive training program at Airways Aviation’s state-of-the-art facilities in Gold Coast, Australia, culminating in each cadet logging a total of 200 flying hours bringing them one step closer to becoming future PAL pilots. |
|
They're not affiliated with Omni in Clark anymore?
|
|
In reply to this post by romantic_guy08
The Department of Transportation issues a show cause order to Philippine Airlines after it received reports that PAL failed to assist passengers of PR102 after landing in Japan.
The flight bound for Los Angeles was diverted to Haneda Airport earlier on Thursday, April 10, after one of the two air conditioning units of the aircraft started emitting smoke. “Upon landing, it was noted that no ground personnel or transport support were available to assist the passengers,” the order read. The flag carrier has until 4 pm to respond. |
|
First Philippine Airlines A350-1000 parts is seen at hangar 261 in Hamburg with MSN 758 written on the rear fuselage section.
It will be transferred in Toulouse for assembly |
|
In reply to this post by Gustavo J Oppenheimer
In a recent interview with Ch-aviation, Mike confirmed that they currently have no plans to order smaller aircraft like the Embraer E2. In fact, their long-term plan is to retire the ATRs, finding them not ideal due to fleet complexity. They're banking on airport upgrades to make those aircraft redundant. Of course, that might not be practical in practice since some airports will never be able to handle larger aircraft like El Nido.
|
|
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EeygYwd1x/
Meanwhile, Scoot has launched SIN-ILO today. |
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by filipinoavgeek
ATR is actually operated by a different airline, not CEB itself. Mike can say one thing and Lance another. If acquisition is any indication, then the latter has the last say. Wait, they did acquire a new airline... See how stark the difference was
Making Sense
|
|
In reply to this post by filipinoavgeek
https://tribune.net.ph/2025/04/12/eu-visitors-rise-25-with-air-frances-flights
Meanwhile, it seems that AF's CDG flights are actually doing decently if not well and helping grow the Europe market. Load factors to Manila still need some work (but they seem pleased with it nonetheless) but the load factors to Paris are high. (Slight tangent, but to anyone else here, does anyone know how to prevent replies from happening? This post was supposed to be a separate post but it ended up appearing as a reply. I still don't get how some posts can be not replies while others end up being replies.) |
|
Administrator
|
Just post it as a new topic without the "Re:"
Further to that Travel pattern simply means one thing. OFW traffic going one way for deployment in Europe. Traffic pattern was similar to Middle East circa 2000. Nowadays, return traffic is already there. Its good enough that they have that load factor. I did remember someone told me about the one-way traffic pattern to EU. I think we were talking about KLM. UK has a better distribution, and it has more seats taken in front and for which reason it survives until covid, and they are seasonal too!
Making Sense
|
|
So I'm guessing PR suspending London has less to do with the market and more to do with a lack of planes? If my recollection was correct they only suspended it due to the Ukraine invasion.
As for the outbound high factors, I was actually assuming a lot of that is tourist traffic (more Filipinos going to Europe) rather than solely OFWs. |
|
PR is growing its VN presence from adding DAD starting 01JUL to adding HAN frequency starting 03JUN. Redeye flight is daily while adding Tu/Th/Sa frequency departing MNL at 0750H.
SGN is currently at 8X a week while HAN will be 10X a week I guess VN is the new tourist hotspot. |
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by filipinoavgeek
Tourism traffic always goes back from where it came from. Data suggests AF passengers were not tourists but contract workers. One way traffic. Return would be after deployment ends, unless they find another job, in which case return would be postponed for quite some time. Compared with UK traffic, there are many professional Filipino workers resident in London that support the route bringing their family with them. PR just lacked planes after C11. In fact, the damage caused by lack of planes is evident on their operational plans.
PAL doesn't have problems overflying Russian Airspace. We are the only western-oriented country able to do so. While uncertainty over Ukraine war may have played a role during those times, its not the reason why PAL left LHR. They gave up most of their new and more expensive A359s to stay afloat and survive. Together with that is one route the planes flew.
Making Sense
|
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
