Administrator
|
I failed to update this to reflect this story from GMA news. Few might missed this very important part, as previously stated in my post.
https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/money/companies/842448/cavitex-yuchengco-led-consortium-set-to-bag-sangley-airport-project-on-sept-15/story/ I may have to reiterate that Sangley Airport is not owned by Cavite government, nor has jurisdiction over it. So close yet so far away!
Making Sense
|
I just wanna ask what happend to the proposal to moved turboprop aircraft and general-aviation from MNL to SGY it seem that the proposal didn't push through? With proposals to banned regional aircraft at MNL will the proposal be revived? And will CRK also play a role in domestic flights? |
Administrator
|
Short answer, covid. Long answer, landing waiver. Hintay ka next year. Paakyat na capacity ng NAIA back to 2019 level.
Making Sense
|
In reply to this post by Arianespace
SPIA JV has been cleared by PCC
https://edge.pse.com.ph/openDiscViewer.do?edge_no=df15dcaf234a1a2eabca0fa0c5b4e4d0 |
Administrator
|
Meaning, money to push it forward.
Making Sense
|
PCC clears SPIA JV. It is now closer to fruition
https://bilyonaryo.com/2024/10/21/no-competition-concerns-pangiinan-yuchengco-consortium-secures-pcc-nod-for-sangley-point-international-airport-project/headlines/ |
https://insiderph.com/virata-yuchengcos-11-b-sangley-airport-project-moves-forward-with-pcc-green-light
The clearance given by the PCC is one of the critical government approvals necessary for the project's successful development,” said Leonides J.M. Virata, authorized representative of SPIA Development Consortium, in a statement. “SPIA remains committed to delivering this project with international standards and recommended practices to be safely operated in accordance with government regulation,” he added. |
This post was updated on .
quite late in the race. it will take 2 years to do land reclamation and 10 years to build the airport - seem everything is just done in jest.
Bulacan, NNIC, and SPIA have influences on the slowed down completion of the NSCR because of its significant output that will mature CRK to finally get its break as major gateway |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by XWB_flyer
The plan to move turboprop and general-aviation aircraft is still there, according to Sec. JJB. He said it here last month. After this statement, this followed, Now, connect this statement to what I said at the other thread for Manila. It now appears that it is heading in that direction. Why would I say so? As it would turn out to be (fees are now increasing exponentially), It would become too expensive for turboprop operations to operate at privately operated and managed NAIA as NNIC wants more money from international carriers that would want their slot. I was told, 1 turboprop slot is equivalent to 6x the money the operator would generate if it were an international flight. 1:6 ratio. That is big. And NNIC is bent on making the 3:6 rate in 5 years time. Why? Because they have obligation to pay national government 50B pesos per annum. And if you think that is not happening, think again! See, double. And that is not the end of it. This is actually what the consortium is waiting for. And yes, the completion of the wide access road that is being build right now. Balesin and other genav operators are already there. Landing is cheap, and airfare would be too when relocation is decided. Airlines would be forced to relocate due to prohibitive cost that is already affecting their bottomline. CEB is seriously considering this airport next year as its turboprop home for its 20 ATR fleet that is being eased out from its home at T4. They will have more slots too. Make sense? https://youtu.be/HfY-Y7LO5TQ?t=35
Making Sense
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |