|
Administrator
|
Guam is a US territory, thus the 1 prefix. Saipan is a little bit strange since Northern Mariana Islands are commonwealth of the US as well.
Unlike Guam which was part of the Philippines by reason of Spanish sovereignty, Saipan was part of Germany after the German-Spanish war in 1899, and Japan by 1914 to 1944. I think this was the reason why they are treated separately. Filipinos comprises 35% of Saipan population. Palau used to be part of Micronesia under the old US bilateral. Since its independence in 1994, it ceases to be part of Micronesia. Previously, Guam, Saipan and Palau were Routes 1 of US Bilaterals until 1996.
Making Sense
|
|
Administrator
|
NAIA Terminal 3 now offers complimentary shuttle to Clark International Airport
Making Sense
|
|
In reply to this post by airline_builder
Incident at NAIA Terminal 1 this morning.
Ceiling of the newly opened arrival extension collapsed... https://x.com/ABSCBNNews/status/2039916626754273724?s=20 |
|
and to think ito pa naman ang bagong bukas na area... sinong contractor ba ang kinuha ng NNIC para dito?
|
|
Administrator
|
For avgeeks and buffs like us. Live traffic. Must have. FR24 or Airnav and RPLL ATC. At the comfort of your own home. Just in case you're interested. Reviewed it yesrteday. Host has done a fine job. Could be better. But good enough, for now.
https://www.youtube.com/@MNL.FLIGHTS
Making Sense
|
Great channel. Oren is a great host and the quality of the stream has improved significantly with the new camera he got awhile ago. |
|
https://youtu.be/8tT_iFqYvME?si=CDJoA0C1PAaODRHq&t=417
This was posted yesterday. Not sure when it was taken. But by the looks of it, not a lot of progress on T2 expansion and T5 construction. It's already May. No new terminal reassignment announcements. While T3 improvements are visible, we still don't see how they'll be able to transfer PAL and other FSCs there if there's no facility that can take on CebPac's domestic passenger volume. Also, how is the new T4 at the old cargo terminal? Isn't it supposed to open next month? |
|
I was at NAIA last month and also saw some recent T1 pictures a couple of weeks ago. T4 is far from finished and I would be surprised if it was open by the end of the year, let alone next month.
|
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Arianespace
LTP new contract with NNIC was finally signed Monday. According to source it is substantially more than what they paid for previously but not what NNIC is asking them. Now lets wait for the news
Making Sense
|
|
Saw a FB post stating that LTP will remove its line maintenance operations. How true?
|
|
Administrator
|
I was not provided with the details as they are accordinly confidential contracts. Could also be true. Anyway, whatever it is we will soon find out.
Making Sense
|
|
In reply to this post by frequentflier
Apparently 2P is terminating its line maintenance contract with LTP and moving them in-house together with all PR narrowbody... From Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/AviationPH/comments/1tbu83b/lufthansa_technik_philippines_update/ ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
Administrator
|
Apparently, PAL did settle for P710 per square meters valid for 5 years only, and based on illustrations provided above, payment is now shared between LTP and PAL. According to source, 5 years is enough time for LTP to downscale operations at NAIA and slowly build up infrastructures in Clark.
Making Sense
|
So the rumors about Lufthansa Technik pulling out of the Philippines entirely are unfounded? They will just decamp to Clark instead? The current plan is to stay in Manila for at least five more years, but come 2031 or so they will focus on Clark and close down Manila? But if that happens, what will happen to the Manila facilities? Would another company (whether SIA Engineering or someone else) take over then? |
What will happen? Most likely and expanded Terminal 3 |
Maybe not since the problem is not LTP but Villamor Air Base. Even if LTP was to leave its current facility, the area will still have PAL's in-house operations, so unless that leaves too then it doesn't matter. |
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by filipinoavgeek
Downscaling is not synonymous with "leaving," but can easily be describe as moving to a smaller facility. LTP is controlled by Lufthansa Tecknik while PAL M&E is controlled by the airline. Notice, they just advice LTP employees to apply to PAL M&E. So the most likely scenario in 5 years is PAL taking over most of LTP hangars and facilities. Remember, they have 8 + 13 more jets coming. At least, those that has been confirmed so far. So technically, PAL need those valuable aprons for line services while C and D checks is more favorable to be placed at Clark. Because they sit longer on the ground.
Making Sense
|
|
Administrator
|
And so it does, LTP intends to build a second hangar in CRK valued at around $150 million (P8 billion) to be built over two years. The proposed hangar, covering two hectares of leased land, can accommodate at least two Airbus A380s, to be used for base maintenance.
Lufthansa expands land lease in Clark
Making Sense
|
|
2P is absorbing the line maintenance personnel to be let go by LTP but not 100%. Some are heading towards SIA Engineering
|
|
Also A plus?
|
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
